Category: Uncategorized

  • EPISODE 2,207: EDWARD FREEMAN STORY: EYWOOD ESTATE, with a touch of SCANDAL

    EPISODE 2,207: EDWARD FREEMAN STORY: EYWOOD ESTATE, with a touch of SCANDAL

    Note:  This is the beginning of a series of episodes centred around Edward Freeman who became the Head Gardener
    at Eywood between 1898 to 1906 when he migrated in 1908 to Canada.  Edward Freeman was my grandfather.  His decisions and
    adventures should have some interest beyond our family.   Little is written about head gardeners so these tales about
    Edward Freeman might fill a void.   But first here is a bit of scandal to whet your interest.  What would you do if Lord Byron
    arrived?  Both males and females can answer the question.


    EPISODE 2,207:  THE HISTORY OF EYWOOD BY NICHOLAS KINGSLEY and the Lord Byron and Jane Scott scandal



    Scandal at Eywood

    Probably the only part you will remember occurred when Lord Byron had a love affair with Jane Scott.  Her husband Edward Harley
    took long walks around the three lakes at Ewood while Jane and Lord Byron made love.  She was 40 and he was 24. Those
    were the days!

    alan
    Jan. 20, 2025
    (article by Kingsley below)

    Edward Harley (1773-1848), 5th Earl of Oxford, came of age in 1794, and in that year married Jane Scott, a Hampshire clergyman’s daughter. She was to be the Countess of Oxford with whom Lord Byron had an affair in 1812 (when she was forty and he was 24 and on the rebound from Lady Caroline Lamb)

    The Eywood estate at Titley was acquired at the beginning of the 18th century by Edward Harley (1664-1735), the younger brother of Robert Harley, 1st Earl of Oxford, who was Speaker of the House of Commons and later Chancellor of the Exchequer under Queen Anne. Edward was appointed by his brother to the lucrative office of Auditor of the Imprest, and the proceeds of this appointment are said to have funded the building of a new house at Eywood in about 1705. I have not found an 18th century view of the house, although it seems likely that one exists, but it seems probable that the house of this time was a plain five by five bay block of three storeys. The rusticated basement and giant Ionic columns, which decorated the front may also have been original features, or they may have been added later in the 18th century (the house is said to have been ‘much altered’). Inside, there was a fine staircase, with three turned and fluted balusters per step, which survived later alterations to the building. Another fine room was the fully-panelled Oak Room, used latterly as a billiard room, and the house also retained some other plain but handsome fireplaces which were obviously of the 1705 period. 

    In 1735 Edward Harley was succeeded by his son, Edward Harley (1699-1755), who succeeded his cousin as 3rd Earl of Oxford in 1741. With the earldom came the Brampton Bryan estate in Herefordshire, the ancient seat of the Harleys, and Eywood seems thereafter to have became a secondary estate of the earls. This did not, however, mean that Eywood was neglected. Either Edward Harley or the 3rd Earl established a landscaped setting for the house, for Bishop Pococke noted on his travels in September 1756 that ‘Lord Oxford has a large house and a fine lawn, with a beautiful piece of water and great woods on the hill over it’, which remained a fair description of the house in later years. Edward Harley (1726-90), 4th Earl of Oxford, brought Capability Brown to Eywood in 1775, but it is far from clear that he made any proposals for the estate, let alone that these were executed. Nonetheless, by 1795 there were three pools at Eywood (two remain) and there are still great stands of woodland in the parkland setting of the house. 

    Edward Harley (1773-1848), 5th Earl of Oxford, came of age in 1794, and in that year married Jane Scott, a Hampshire clergyman’s daughter. She was to be the Countess of Oxford with whom Lord Byron had an affair in 1812 (when she was forty and he was 24 and on the rebound from Lady Caroline Lamb). By the time Byron stayed at Eywood in 1812, however, the house had been greatly altered, for Lord Oxford employed Robert Smirke in 1805-07 to enlarge and modernise it. Smirke seems to have turned the early 18th century square block into a courtyard house by adding much longer, three-storey wings to either side of the original house, and a connecting wing joining the ends of the two wings to the north-west. On the main south front, the new wings were stepped back a little from the original block, which with its tall parapet and giant order continued to dominate the appearance of the house. A new entrance was made into the north-east wing, and the ground floor of the main block and this wing were rusticated. Inside, Smirke created new interiors, including a grand new dining room with a screen of columns across one end, a new drawing room, and several other rooms with fine chimneypieces and simple plasterwork, A new pleasure ground was laid out around the house. 

    In 1848, Eywood and Brampton Bryan passed to Alfred Harley (1809-53), 6th and last Earl of Oxford. When he died, Brampton Bryan passed to his widow (d. 1877) while Eywood passed to his elder daughter, Lady Langdale. She died in 1872 and after some legal wrangling, Eywood passed to her sister, Lady Charlotte Bacon, the widow of Gen. Anthony Bacon, whose career had encompassed being ‘the finest cavalry officer in the army’, two years imprisonment for debt, an abortive attempt to found a colony in south Australia, and military service under Don Pedro, King of Portugal and Emperor of Brazil. At the time of her inheritance, Lady Charlotte was living in Australia with her children, but she came home and died at Eywood in 1880. Her son, Edward Bacon (b. 1842) sold Eywood to Arthur Walsh (1827-1920), 2nd Baron Ormathwaite, who in turn sold it in 1892 to Charles James Paul Gwyer (1854-1940) and his wife Mary (1862-1950). 

    The Gwyers brought in W.O. Milne to remodel the house, which was looking decidedly run-down after half a century of only intermittent occupation. The wings of of the house were reduced from three storeys to two, and the central block was remodelled, removing the giant order and replacing it with bold rustication at the angles of the building and rather chunky window surrounds. The house that resulted was more unified in appearance than before. A large new porch with eclectic detailing was built on the east side, and this is ironically almost the only part of the building to survive today. For after the death of Mrs Gwyer in 1950, the estate was sold to a Mr Vowells, who sold off the farms and demolished the house almost entirely. The house went, it would seem, because it was so large and the owner had no use for it: it appears not to have been in poor condition. The landscaping and the stable block survive, but the porch and some odd stumps of walling are all that remain of the house today. At least one of the chimneypieces from the house was acquired by the Harleys and taken to Brampton Bryan.


  • EPSODE  2,226  -JEAN  CHRETIEN IS IN A FIGHTING MOOD OVER THE 25% TARIFF AIMED TO DESTROY CANADA — IT WON’TWORK — (thanks to globe and mail research news)

    EPSODE 2,226 -JEAN CHRETIEN IS IN A FIGHTING MOOD OVER THE 25% TARIFF AIMED TO DESTROY CANADA — IT WON’TWORK — (thanks to globe and mail research news)

    Episode  2,226

    alan skeoch
    jan. 15, 2025

    Now here is the Jean Chretien I remember so well…always willing to step in and step up
    when needed.  Bullying just does not work Mr. Trump.  We Canadians have regarded
    Americans as our best friends even though our political structure is different.   I find it
    difficult to understand why we are now on the U.S. hate list.  Or is this some kind of game!

    Read below…Jean Chretien is really angry and hurt…and I believe expresses our collective will.



  • EPISODE 1,205, JANUARY 15, 2025: PICASSO’S GUERNICA: YOU MUST INTERPRET THE PAINTING YOURSELF FIRST


    EPISODE 1,205,  JANUARY 15, 2025:   PICASSO’S GUERNICA:  YOU MUST INTERPRET THE PAINTING YOURSELF FIRST

    alan skeoch
    january 15, 2025

    Note:  Marjorie invited me to view the film Picasso at our local cinema.  I had not given the painting much thought
    although I had seen it often in my 86 years.  Perhaps you are as ignorant as I was.  Can you see meaning?
    My thanks to Margaret Geare and the retired elementary teachers of Mississauga.  Visit AMC In January.


    PABLO PICASSO’S MOST FAMOUS PIECE OF ART —“GUERNICA”

    What does it mean?   Picasso never explained the meaning.  And even today there are
    various interpretations of Guernica.   If asked meaning Picasso is said to have carried a pistol
    loaded with blanks that he fired at those seeking meaning from him.  Why did he do that? What does Guernica mean?
    Take a look and suggest meaning.  What do you see?  Do that now…before looking at
    what others see.  Do it now.

    Your note?  Right here!


    WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED on  on April and May , 1937

    Guernica, located in Basque country, was a place of particular importance to the Republicans. Although the city had no military significance, it was symbolic of the Basque culture. On April 26, 1937, Hitler’s German Condor Legion bombed the city for three hours, acting in support of General Franco. Twenty five bomber planes bombed the town with 100,000 pounds of explosives, and twenty more planes hunted down citizens trying to flee the scene. It is thought that the majority of citizens were trapped in the center of the town, as it was market day, and they were unable to escape as the roads and bridges surrounding them had been destroyed. The majority of men were at war, so most of the 1,600 townspeople injured or killed were women and children. 

    News of the attack reached Paris on May 1, 1937. As a supporter of the Republicans, Picasso was horrified by the news and began work on the preliminary sketches that would become the Guernica mural. In the 1940s, a German officer would see a photograph of Guernica in Picasso’s apartment and ask, “Did you do that?”, to which Picasso replied, “No. You did.”


    I am not an art critic.  When I searched my mind for meaning what did I see?   I saw the
    absolute horrors of war.  A bomb has been detonated in the market square of the
    Basque town of Guernica in 1937…dropped from a Nazi dive bomber on women and children…
    horses and bulls…blasting them into tiny meaningful pieces…expressing Picasso’s hatred
    of war and the mindless atrocities war brings upon innocent people and animals.

    No doubt that ignorant comment would prompt Picasso to take a blank shot at me.

    WHAT DO OTHERS SEE IN ‘GUERNICA’?
    (courtesy of singulart)

    In Guernica, we can see six human figures – four women, a man, and a child – as well as a horse and a bull. The scene is frenzied, lit only by a lamp bulb bursting with light over all of the chaos. 

    To the left of the painting, a bull whose side has been pierced by a dagger looms over a devastated mother, wailing as she holds her dead child in her arms. A horse brays as it tramples a fallen man, whose right arm has been severed from his body. In his dismembered hand he holds a shattered sword, and we can see a flower blooming from his clenched fist. Two ghostly figures float eerily toward the center of the piece, one holding a gas lamp to examine the turmoil in front of her. At the right of the painting, we can see a figure screaming, engulfed in flames.   

    Guernica is painted in a monochromatic palette, using a technique known as grisaille. Picasso had a paint specially created for Guernica in order to use the least amount of gloss possible and emulate the immediacy of wartime photography. Despite the immense size of Guernica, it only took Picasso a month and a half to complete, ready to be exhibited in the Spanish Pavilion of the Paris World Fair. 

    Speaking about Guernica, Picasso stated: 

    “My whole life as an artist has been nothing more than a continuous struggle against reaction and the death of art. In the picture I am painting, which I shall call Guernica, I am expressing my horror of the military caste which is now plundering Spain into an ocean of misery and death.” 

    Symbolism of Guernica 

    Picasso never publicly confirmed any of the interpretations of Guernica, and its meaning has been hotly debated ever since its creation. Here, Singulart breaks down the elements of the piece along with their possible symbolism. 

    www.singulart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-H25224_Guernica_Ruinen-300×220.jpg 300w, www.singulart.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-H25224_Guernica_Ruinen-768×562.jpg 768w” sizes=”(max-width: 761px) 100vw, 761px” style=”box-sizing: border-box; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; max-width: 100%; display: block; border: 0px; vertical-align: bottom; outline: 0px !important;” apple-inline=”yes” id=”C9326565-BAC3-4A26-9843-672B599DDD88″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-H25224_Guernica_Ruinen.jpg”>
    Die Ruinen von Guernica 5603/37

    It is believed that the bull, with its dispassionate, expressionless face, could symbolize Franco. However, as a bull is a symbol for virility, the stab wounds of the bull could symbolize that man is fractured, that humanity in general is in trouble. It has also been theorized that the bull could be an emblem of Spanish culture, as Picasso had referenced bullfighting in previous paintings (this would also account for the stab wounds on the bull). 

    The mother and child at the left of the painting could be a reference to Madonna and child, or more specifically a symbol of pieta. Pieta, or pity, is a trope that has been seen in countless artworks, referencing Mary carrying Jesus’s dead body in her arms after he was taken down from the cross. 

    The horse is the center of the painting; our eye is immediately drawn to its panicked, hysterical expression. It is generally believed that the horse symbolizes the Guernican people, with the arrow piercing the horse’s side adding to this conclusion. It is interesting to note that early sketches of the horse, hidden on this canvas by layers of paint and revisions, portrayed it with a downward expression, as if admitting defeat. Here, in the final version, the horse has been struck and in pain but remains defiant until its last moments. 

    The only male figure in this painting can be seen under the horse, screaming in pain as the horse tramples his dismembered body. Only the upper half of his body is visible, with the rest lost in the swirling chaos surrounding him. While one of his hands shows signs of the stigmata, another Biblical reference, a white flower grows out of the broken sword in the other hand, which could symbolize hope after destruction. 

    The lamp that hangs overhead, illuminating the scene, could be interpreted as a bomb dropping. However, some critics have argued that it represents the eye of God. It has also been suggested that the lamp represents the notion of technology being used to propel evil, shining a spotlight on the dark side of modern technology. 

    Historians have debated the meaning of the three women on the right side of the painting. It has been suggested that the women represent the three fates, as seen in Greek mythology, or that they could depict the three martyred virgins of early Christianity. They could also be a reflection of Picasso’s personal life, portraying his wife and two lovers. 

    Picasso was deliberately obtuse about the meaning of Guernica, which is partly why it has been so thoroughly discussed and debated since its creation. He stated, “It isn’t up to the painter to define the symbols… The public who look at the picture must interpret the symbols as they understand them.”


  • Episode 1,204: ARTICLE BY PETE McMARTIN == VANCOUVER SUN, dec.26, 2023


    I just received this article written by Pete McMartin and published by the Vancouver Sun.
    Yes, Most Canadians suffer from a ‘holier than thou’ tendency when confronted by
    the gun loving United States.

    Terrific article John…can I send it forward to my Episodes with credit to Pete McMartin?

    We are living in a sane society bordering an insane society.  Gun loving. Long ago we inherited the
    family rifle. I carried it to the OPP detachment close to us rather than pass it on to
    my eldest son.  Assume it was destroyed.   

    We put real maple syrup on pan cakes .. 
                                                                                                                                                                                            m,,,,,,,,
    alan skeoch

    january 9, 2025









    Pete McMartin: Why the U.S. should be Canada’s 11th province
    Donald Trump joked about Canada becoming the 51st state during his dinner with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at Mar-a-Lago last month
    Author of the article:
    Published Dec 26, 2024
    Sixteen reasons why the U.S. should become Canada’s 11th province:

    • Because Canada isn’t led by a convicted felon.

    • Because the only thing in maple syrup is maple syrup, as opposed to high-fructose corn syrup, water, cellulose gum, salt, caramel colour, sorbic acid, sodium benzoate, sodium citrate and artificial flavours, which Americans call “pancake syrup” — although in a pinch it can be used as transmission fluid.

    • Because the scandal-ridden U.S. Supreme Court has members on it who appear to be uniquely unqualified to judge conflicts-of-interest, women’s rights or ethical conduct. According to most recent polls, the court’s reputation has sunk to historical lows, with a majority of Americans unhappy with its performance. Meanwhile, the only thing scandalous about Canada’s Supreme Court is … wait, what? Canada has a Supreme Court?

    • Because Saturday Night Live has never been, or ever will be, as funny as SCTV or Kids In The Hall.

    • Because as of 2022, life expectancy in Canada was 81.3 years, while life expectancy in the U.S. was 77.43 years. Scientists believe this discrepancy was due, in large part, to the consumption of pancake syrup.

    • According to the U.S. non-profit Prison Policy Initiative, the U.S. has the highest incarceration rate of any democracy in the world. In fact, every single U.S. state incarcerates more people per capita than all but 28 other nations on earth. Louisiana has the highest rate of incarceration at 1,067 inmates per 100,000 population, while Massachusetts has the lowest rate at 241 inmates per 100,000 population. Canada’s is 88 inmates per 100,000 population.

    • Because while thousands of Canadians were dying on the battlefields of Europe and Asia during the Second World War, the U.S. remained neutral for the next two years, unable or unwilling to recognize the threat that fascists posed to the world. Apparently, Americans are still unable to recognize that threat, especially the one at home.

    • Because the United States has transformed the longest undefended border in the world into a bullshit political talking point in which trade, transgressions and blame flow only one way. If President-elect Donald Trump is upset by fentanyl going southward — despite the fact that the amount of fentanyl going into the U.S. from Canada is so small his own U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration characterizes it as “slippage” — why does he not show the same concerns for illegal firearms going northward? If, as he sees it, a trade imbalance exists in Canada’s favour, why is he resorting to inflationary tariffs on Canadian goods rather than recognizing and addressing the real reason for that trade imbalance — namely his constituents’ insatiable appetites and need for Canadian oil, gas, electrical power, automobiles, rare minerals, gold, lumber, etc.?

    • As of mid-December, according to CNN, there have been at least 83 school shootings in the U.S. in 2024, which left 38 people dead and at least 115 people physically injured. How many people were left permanently traumatized by those shootings was not reported. While the U.S. government does not track these attacks, The Washington Post was able to document at least 426 school shootings since the infamous 1999 massacre at Columbine High School in Colorado. At least 215 children and teachers died in those attacks. America’s response to end this carnage? More guns. As of last count, at least 25 U.S. states allow schools or school districts to give permission to “individuals” to carry guns on school property. Twenty states already allow school security personnel to carry guns, while nine states have enacted policies allowing school employees other than security personnel to carry guns on school property.

    • Because Americans insist on killing themselves due to a perverse love of guns. Americans make up four per cent of the world’s population but own just under 50 per cent of the entire global stock of civilian firearms. American civilians own approximately 400 million guns, more than those held by the other top 25 countries combined. The U.S. Constitution enshrined the right of people “to keep and bear arms” in a militia — an anachronism Americans still embrace with deadly enthusiasm. Since 2014, the number of related gun deaths have surpassed 39,000 a year, and have topped 50,000 deaths a year several times. Firearms have become the leading cause of death for children ages one to 17, and disproportionately increase rates of violence among the poor and people of colour.

    • Because even the American anthem glorifies war and violence. Rockets’ red glare? Bombs bursting in air? Words to die by. The Canadian anthem? The only thing remotely incendiary are glowing hearts.

    • Because the American ethos of unbridled egotism, consumerism and capitalism is given licence in the aptly named Declaration of Independence, where it is enshrined as “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” — which could double as the catchphrase for Eat, Pray, Love. The Canadian ethos, on the other hand, is stated in our constitution as “peace, order and good government” — which is undeniably duller and less inspiring, but then it has been the guiding principle in developing a civil society in which we don’t feel the need to arm our teachers.

    • Because one has to wonder why, in 2023, the U.S. spent $916 billion on its military, or more than the next nine countries combined. Possibly, this may have to do with the fact that, since its inception, the U.S. has been involved in 115 military conflicts. Baseball is not America’s national pastime.

    • Because abortion was made legal in Canada in 1969 under certain circumstances, and became legal throughout the country in 1988, while in the U.S., the Supreme Court (see “uniquely unqualified” above) overturned previous legal decisions protecting abortion rights, thus boldly going back to a patriarchal past where women are second-class citizens without the right to make decisions about their own bodies while men are still free to procreate without regard to legal, financial or moral responsibility.

    • Because it’s called North America, not “Amerika.”

    • Because America has chosen to alienate its closest friend and ally in the world. Make that America’s last remaining friend in the world.



  • EPISODE  1,201:   CATARACT SURGERY…NERVOUS ?  WHO WOULD NOT BE NERVOUS?

    EPISODE 1,201: CATARACT SURGERY…NERVOUS ? WHO WOULD NOT BE NERVOUS?




    EPISODE  1,201:   CATARACT SURGERY…NERVOUS ?  WHO WOULD NOT BE NERVOUS?

    alan skeoch
    january 7, 2025

    close-up of surgeons hands performing manual eye surgery - cataract surgery stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images


    nurse watching senior patient after eye surgery in hospital - cataract surgery stock pictures, royalty-free photos & images

    “Alan, your surgeon, Dr. Khan, is on the phone!”
    “Hello…what a surprise…a phone call Sunday evening,”
    “How are you?”
    “Fine…no need for glasses any more.
    “That’s fine.”
    “If you need an assistant surgeon, give me a call,  I was able to watch
    what you did to my right eye as both eyes were open.”

    I was joking, of course.  My comment was partly true though. I was conscious
    and watching…or it seemed so.  Dr. Khan had precision tools to make a slight
    incision in my eyeball then extricate my lens and replace it with a new lens.
    That sounds so simple.

    I was scared from the moment a nurse slid me onto a wheeled stretcher to
    the moment she wheeled me down a long hallway at Queensway Hospital
    to the operating room.  Just the thought of cutting my eyeball made me
    feel wobbly.

    The whole operation was done in a few minutes then I was wheeled into
    a recovery room and offered apple juice.  “Can I have a second
    apple juice”?  “Sure…you will be going home shortly.”

    That is my story in a nutshell.  Catatact surgery has been perfected.
    Wish I had not read so much about it.  I belong to the ‘what can go
    wrong, will go wrong’ school of thought.
    Noting went wrong.

    “The eyedrops are the biggest problem, Alan,” said friend John Myers.
    And he is correct. Three kinds of eyedrops have to be dropped into
    the eye before and after surgery.  That is not easy to do.
    I am lucky.  Marjorie does the eye dropping and she does this
    four times a day with a three minute pause between drops each session.

    “Open your eye…here comes a drop.”

    WHAT IF I DID NOT HAVE MARJORIE?  

    IT is difficult to do eyedrops into your own eye.   But that is what
    a great number of patients face.  Living alone they must be their
    own nurse.   Every time Marjorie says “Hold still !” I cringe and
    feel sorry for myself.  What a fool I am! Imagine being alone.

    Well I bet there are a lot of people living alone right now … trying
    to get eyedrops in their own eyes.  And missing with the dropper.

    Cataract surgeons, like DR. Khan, are professional.  They know
    however that the surgery is only part of the game.   

    “Alan, lean back…way back…look at the ceiling.”

    ALAN

    Note:  SORRY my stories have been delayed by Dr. Khan, Marjorie and
    an eye dropper.