Author: terraviva

  • EPISODE 321 PORT CREDIT POST CARDS…FULL SIZE…HARBOUR, STONEHOOKER, ETC. FROM DAN BOWYER


    EPISODE 323    THREE POST CARDS … OLD PORT CREDIT  HARBOUR…STONEHOOKING DAYS  1900 to 1920


    alan skeoch

        april 2021


    WHAT a wonderful surprise.  These three post cards leapt out at me when I opened Dan Boyer’s email.  I could
    almost step into the pictures of old Port Credit in the days of the Stonehookers.   I must go down to the Credit River mouth
    with my camera and  stand where this photographer must have stood.   Maybe Rob Leonard will beat me to it.

    When would be a better time to live?  1900?  2021?  Our tendency to romanticize the past will come into question when
    I get around to telling the story about Liverpool Andy…a waif whose short life as a teenager on Toronto docks illustrates
    the horrors of  being poor and forgotten in the days  when there was no social safety net .  That story is coming…look for
    “The short life of Liverpool Andy on the Toronto waterfront”.  Meanwhile enjoy these images of the past in Port Credit, Ontario
    …and thank Dan
    for taking the time to find them for us all.

    Alan,

    I was so touched by your latest article (ie. Episode 220: Stonehooking was  a brutal profession)..that I put down everything and dug out these postcards for you! Enjoy!

    Dan😎🥍
    ~~~~~~~


    courtesy of Dan Bowyer

    alan skeoch

    april 2021



  • EPISODE 322 GOOD NEWS: OUR FARM HOUSE IS JUST FINE (sent lest episode 321 is too depressing)

    EPISODE 322     GOOD NEWS:  OUR FARM HOUSE IS JUST FINE (sent lest episode 321 is too depressing)


    alan skeoch
    april 2021

    Sorry about episode 321…too bloody depressing.  So I am sending these pictures.  They cheer me up
    whenever I am down.  I can almost see granddad Freeman out in the front tending his cedar hedge and then
    checking the rhubarb patch behind the house in anticipation of another crop of rhubarb wine.  April is a nice
    month in our lives.

    Good times trump bad times.

    alan
  • EPISODE 322 NO HORSES HERE ANYMORE: DEVELOPMENT LAND SOUTH EAST OF MILTON 2021


    EPISODE 322    NO HORSES HERE ANYMORE: DEVELOPMENT LAND, SIXTH  LINE, SOUTH EAST OF MILTON, ONTARIO, APRIL 2021

    alan skeoch
    april 2021


    A BIT depressing.  I know that.  Change is the only sure thing in life.  Maybe the pones and horses
    have moved on to a better home where the barn is not in danger of collapse.  Yes, that must be
    what happened.



    When these Ontario barns were built I wonder if the builders expected them to 
    be on site forever?

  • EPISODE 320 STONEHOOKING WAS A BRUTAL PROFESSION

    EPISODE  320    STONEHOOKING WAS A BRUTAL PROFESSION


    alan skeoch
    april 2021

    heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Port-Credit-Harbour-Scene-Stonehooker-in-harbour-1908-Harold-Hare-Image-300×204.jpg 300w, heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Port-Credit-Harbour-Scene-Stonehooker-in-harbour-1908-Harold-Hare-Image-768×523.jpg 768w” sizes=”(max-width: 917px) 100vw, 917px” apple-inline=”yes” id=”55A3C3F0-5013-4CF8-AC66-CE82DC863BC7″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Port-Credit-Harbour-Scene-Stonehooker-in-harbour-1908-Harold-Hare-Image.jpeg”>




    heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Unknown-People-Stonehookers-of-Port-Credit-300×182.jpg 300w” sizes=”(max-width: 723px) 100vw, 723px” apple-inline=”yes” id=”A89B2CCD-4CB9-4A03-81A7-3DF23D292D45″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Unknown-People-Stonehookers-of-Port-Credit-1.jpeg”>

    Stonehooking was a brutal profession.   Today, now that the stonehookers are gone
    and their ships are rotting hulks at the bottom of Lake Ontario or ground into sawdust or
    charcoal by the passage of time and neglect, there is a tendency to romanticize what
    was near the  bottom of occupations Canadians  chose in the 19th and early 20th century.
    Just imagine spending your work day wading in water lifting slabs of stone with crowbar
    and a hooked rake…piling the stone on a small flat bottomed scow…transferring tons
    of stone to a schooner…sailing to Toronto three times a week with 9 to 18 tons of stone
    …piling the stone on a rotting pier with raw sewage bubbling up…then getting $10 to $15
    …and  sailing back to Port Credit with a return load of horse manure.  Toronto was a city
    with thousands of horses on the streets in 1900.  

    PORT CREDIT HARBOUR AROUND 1899-1905
    (SOURCE Schooner Days 112, Nov. 4, 1933, Port Credit’ Stonehookers)

    WHAT DID MOST STONEHOOKERS LOOK LIKE?

    The scow model was used all over the Great Lakes, sometimes in vessels of considerable size, but Port Credit scows were a peculiar variant, and the best of them were so designed that they could carry their whole load on deck. This effected a great saving in handling of cargo.
    One of the best examples of such a model was the scow Coronet, designed and built by Capt. John Miller, for many years lighthouse keeper at Port Credit. She was 53 feet long and 17 feet beam and four feet deep in the hold; drew 18 inches of water light, with her centerboard up; carried thirty tons of stone on deck, with nothing in the hold but stone-chips for ballast. She sailed and sailed well in this trim, although the load brought her deck within eight inches of the water amidships. She was about three feet higher at each end. Her rig was large, the mainboom projecting outboard for 17 feet, half its length. Her topmasts were long, over thirty feet, and her lower masts comparatively short, so that when she clewed up her topsails it was equivalent to reefing ordinary lower sails. She sank off Port Credit in 1899, when owned by a Bronte 

    At the other extreme was the smaller schooner, Ann Brown, built in Toronto about 1836 and owned in Port Credit for a half century by Abram Block, senior, and, in turn, Abram Block, junior, Justice of the Peace, who died this summer in his 83rd year. The Ann Brown was not a scow nor a centreboarder. She was a surviving example of the old “standing keel.” She was 36 feet long and 11 feet beam and 6 feet deep in the hold. She drew 6 feet of water when loaded, and carried slightly over twenty tons of stone, most of it in the hold. Tiny as she was she had made voyages as far east as Kingston as as far west as Manitoulin Island, for she was built for the fur-trade with the Indians of the Georgian Bay. She was sailed for many years by Thomas Block, a brother of Abram Block, J.P., and survived until 1904. In her early days she had a square topsail and topgallantsail, although the yards for these sails were so short they could be used for pike-poles. 

    HOW DID A STONEHOOKER GET ITS LOAD OF STONE?

    The stonehooker usually anchored on the lake shore and collected a cargo by sending in a small flat scow, into which loads of stones were gathered from the beach itself or from the bottom, long rakes, with prong-like forks being used for the purpose. Some have thought that these hook-like rakes gave the name to the trade.

    Stonehooking was very wet work, the men sometimes wading the shore waist-deep in water, quarrying the stone loose with crowbars, and lifting it on to the small scow, which was usually decked over and water-tight as a wooden bottle.

    SMALL FLAT BOTTOMED  SCOWS — AND PARENT LARGER SCHOONERS AND SCOWS TO CARRY 9  TONS OF STONE

    heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Sailors-Port-Credit-Harbour-with-stonehooking-scow-undated-300×234.jpg 300w” sizes=”(max-width: 641px) 100vw, 641px” apple-inline=”yes” id=”03FF66DA-2E12-4EA4-87C4-8387A4160897″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Sailors-Port-Credit-Harbour-with-stonehooking-scow-undated.jpeg”>



    When the scow was loaded it was poled or sculled out to the parent stonehooker, and its cargo transferred to her deck and hold. These small scows could carry about a third of a toise, or three tons deadweight. It took from ten to forty scowloads to give the stonehooker her full cargo. Gravel was loaded in the same way, except that it was shoveled from the beach to the deck of the scow, and not gathered with rakes.

    The first vessels engaged in the trade were the small coasters, some scows and some schooner-built, which had been in the grain, lumber and cordwood trade while this was profitable for small vessels. It was soon found that the scows were particularly well fitted for carrying stone, and the specialized scow model resulted. 

    WHY  WAS  SO MUCH STONE NEEDED?

    Stonehooking flourished through the decades while great harbors were being constructed on Lake Ontario, and stone was needed to fill the timber cribs; and while cities were growing and needed building stone for walls, flat stones for sidewalks, cobble stones for pavements, and crushed stone for macadamized roadways

    WHY WERE STONEHOOKERS SO  SECRETIVE ABOUT THEIR TRADE?




    heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Port-Credit-Harbour-Stonehooker-Lillian-and-Harbour-Dredge-c1900-300×215.jpg 300w, heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Port-Credit-Harbour-Stonehooker-Lillian-and-Harbour-Dredge-c1900-768×550.jpg 768w” sizes=”(max-width: 866px) 100vw, 866px” apple-inline=”yes” id=”0119E144-75E4-407C-870C-9869727AB6B1″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Port-Credit-Harbour-Stonehooker-Lillian-and-Harbour-Dredge-c1900-1.jpeg”>


    It cannot be said that all stonehookers hailed from Port Credit, but all used that harbor, and many of them were owned there. Surprisingly few showed “of Port Credit” on their sterns; partly for the reason that the stonehookers were engaged in warfare with the lakeshore farmers, until the third or fourth generation. The farmers objected to the stone being carried from their beaches, over which they claimed riparian rights.

    At one time what was called the “three-rod law” prevailed for the protection of beaches in Halton, Peel and York counties; stonehookers were not allowed to remove stone, sand or gravel from within three perches or 49 1/2 feet, of the water’s edge.
    Conditions being such, stonehooker mariners had no great desire to display, for the convenience for prosecutors, the name of the port where they could be found. Many Port Credit stonehookers were registered in Toronto, and had “of Toronto” following their names on the sternboards. Others were “of Hamilton” or “of Oakville.” In some cases stonehookers actually built in Port Credit to appear on the marine registry as having been built in Toronto, where the registration was made.

    HOW BIG WAS  A STONEHOOKERS CREW?

    Stonehookers, even up to a hundred tons burden, were usually sailed by a crew of two; sometimes single-handed. Occasionally three or four went in vessel, especially in the early days, when wages were low. Profits were small then, for stone sold for $5 a toise, and three trips a week for a two-toise hooker, with her crew of two men, was considered very good work. On this account few steam vessels ever appeared in stonehooking; there were only three, the steam barge Chub of Bronte, the Gordon Jerry, a covered scow-brigantine from Port Dover, and the steam scow Maybird of Toronto

    HOW WAS THE STONE CARGO PRICED?

    As mentioned the stone  was sold at 5$ per ‘noise’ each of which weighed 9 tons.  Small stonehookers could carry two toise. Three trips a week for
    a two person crew.   $30 a week or $15 per man.  Casual labourers might be taken to Toronto as well or hired where the ships were unloaded … 75 cents a day.

    WHAT WAS COST OF LIVING IN 1900 AND THEN 1913 –

    • In 1900, shoppers could buy a 5-pound bag of flour for 12 cents. Round steak was 13 cents a pound, and bacon was a penny more. Eggs were 21 cents per dozen, milk sold for 14 cents per half gallon and butter cost 26 cents per pound.

      Between 1913 and 2021: Food experienced an average inflation rate of 3.11% per year. This rate of change indicates significant inflation. In other words, food costing $20 in the year 1913 would cost $546.95 in 2021 for an equivalent purchase.


    THE CASH INCENTIVE: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN IN TERMS  OF LABOUR?

    To earn $15 each man had to hoist 9 tons of stone from the Lake Ontario shore or shallow water.  Then transfer 9 tons of stone from the small skiffs to
    the parent stonehooker.   Easier to load s scow which was deck loaded  than a schooner which was hold loaded.  Then unload the ship on the Toronto
    dock ad piked in 9 ton units of stone…i.e. the Toise.  There were many larger stonehookers capable of carrying several noise of stone.

    WAS PORT CREDIT HARBOUR AND SHIP BUILDING EXCLUSIEVELY FOR STONEHOOKERS?

    While much  of the harbour was  used by stonehooers there were also commercial fishing boats and a ship building industry.
    Besides the stonehookers mention, several larger sailing vessels were built and owned in Port Credit, such as the schooners Maggie Hunter, Minnie Blakely, Margaret, Caledonia, and the brigantine Credit Chief and British Queen

    DANGEROUS TIMES: THE PINTA DISASTER


    heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Stone-Hooker-Lillian-Port-Credit-Harbour-c1914-300×210.jpg 300w, heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Stone-Hooker-Lillian-Port-Credit-Harbour-c1914-1024×717.jpg 1024w, heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Stone-Hooker-Lillian-Port-Credit-Harbour-c1914-768×538.jpg 768w, heritagemississauga.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Stone-Hooker-Lillian-Port-Credit-Harbour-c1914-1536×1075.jpg 1536w” sizes=”(max-width: 1896px) 100vw, 1896px” apple-inline=”yes” id=”3696DFC0-45ED-4CDC-8053-06DD0A5E1CE6″ src=”https://alanskeoch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Stone-Hooker-Lillian-Port-Credit-Harbour-c1914.jpeg”>



    The Pinta, commonly known as the “Pinty,” was a scow, built for S. H. Cotton at Port Nelson in 1869, She was 58 feet on deck, 14 feet 4 inches beam, and 4 feet 8 inches deep, … Her end was tragic. Coming down from Oakville one cold morning, with a nor’west wind hoofing her along, she tried to go about and stand in for the land off Marigold’s Point, the wind following its usual practice at that point by hauling to the north.

    The Pinta had a big barndoor centreboard. The box was open slotted and came above the deck. The board was new and buoyant. It should have been ballasted until it was sufficiently waterlogged to sink of its own weight. When the snow squall struck the Pinta she luffed and got in irons, and as she lost way her board rose so high in the box that it caught the foreboom and would not let the foresail come over. That doomed her. A second puff caught her canvas aback and rolled her over. Men who were shingling a barn on Marigold’s Point saw her in trouble. She was blotted out by the snow flurry. When it disappeared she had disappeared too.
    “She was loaded too deep, ” said Captain Block. “I guess her hatches just filled when she tried to go about.” All hands were lost, although one man managed to get into the scow towing astern. The offshore wind carried him across the lake and the scow was picked up on the beach at Winona, his frozen body jammed under the thwarts.
    From Port Credit harbor, a tug was seen going up the lake in a futile attempt to render assistance. It was the Mixer, a Toronto boat owned by Frank Jackman. And Port Credit
    sailors still curse the well meant action of the men on Marigold’s Point, who saw the disaster and hastened word to Toronto, when the schooner Morning Star, sound and almost new, with Abe Block and half a dozen others right there to handle her, lay at the dock in Port Credit ready to put out at a minute’s notice hours nearer the disaster in those pre-telephone times.
    It was not until next day that word of the foundering of the “Pinty” reached Port Credit. The victims of the tragedy were William and Joseph Quinn of Oakville, brothers of the owner, Capt. James Quinn, and Bus Howell. Capt. Jas. Quinn and Capt. Mark Blow had left the Pinta some time before her fatal voyage. Oakville sailors had begged the younger mariners not to make a start, for the north wind threatened snow before they left.
    Twenty years later, in 1902, the Wood Duck sailed over the sunken wreck of the Pinta off Marigold’s Point. Her fatal centreboard box was still discernible down in the clear green water amid the remains 

    THE REINDEER WAS THE ‘SWEETHEART OF THE STONEHOOKERS”
    (IMAGINE:  44 foot planks cut from local white pine trees)




    But the Reindeer was the sweetheart of the stonehookers. She was not so when she was bought from Billy Bond, of Oakville, and brought to Port Credit, under the name Ida May, but she was rebuilt by Captain Mark Blower and Captain Block. She was “getting tender,” so they went over her from stem to stern.
    When she entered the water again her sides had been widened, and she had a beautiful spoon bow and springy sheer that were not there before. The remarkable thing, however, was her new planking. Forty-four feet in length was the boat, and the planks ran all the way in one piece. Beautiful 44-foot lengths of clear pine they were. Captain Abe wanted to rechristen her “Buttress” on that account, but Captain Mark preferred Reindeer, and Reindeer it was.
    The job of getting pine planks 44 feet in length can be imagined, but Captain Abe dismisses it casually. The operation, as explained by him, consisted of picking the tree you wanted, felling and trimming it, and hauling it to the slip. Then you hauled it upright with the aid of a three-legged derrick, marked it off into planks, and let brawny arms and a whipsaw do the rest, cutting clean from top to bottom. Clear planks 50 and 60 feet in length were not out of the way, says Captain Abe.
    With the Olympia and the Coral, the Reindeer ended her days laid up in the Credits and after the Great War was finally broken up by order of the village council.





    Alan Skeoch

    Credit:  Snider,  Schooner Days, 48 and 112,  1933
  • EPISODE 319; AUSTRALIAN FIRE RECOVERY ….AND OUR SEARCH FOR THE SUNSHINE HEADER HARVESTER LONG AGO





    EPISODE 319    AUSTRALIAN fire recovery  2021… AND the search for the Sunshine Header Harvester 1990


    alan skeoch
    April 2021

    THis Episode 319 is dedicated to David Skeoch who sent a note that brought
    back memories and also made us feel relieved that some parts of Australia are
    recovering from the fires.

    UNUSUAL NAME LEADS TO AN INTERESTING TRAIL


    Two years ago for no particular reason I wondered if there was  anyone on planet
    earth with the same name as mine?   Our surname is unusual…not like Smith or Taylor or Newman…so
    I just did a little digging prompted by a strange fact that some of my emails went astray.

    Guess what?   i found two other Alan Skeoch’s…two  with my name and exact spelling of Alan.
    One was an American dentist who died.  But the other was  an Australian bush pilot … a young man.
    We communicated.   His father, David, and  I send notes back and forth regularly.  Strange world!

    Today David sent this picture of his farm in a  heavily wooded  part of Australia…New South Wales…
    where the fires were quite  devastating.   Recovery is on its way.  He even speaks of many platypus
    creatures rebounding.   In these days of Covid 19 when all around seems dreary and  our self-isolation
    is harder and  harder to accept,  these pictures of Australia will be uplifting.  Enlarge picture to full
    screen.  Beautiful.





    The Corang River, in which we have Macquarie Perch and lots of wildlife such as Platypus.


    Hi Alan,
    Feel free to send to whom you wish!  The location is Oallen NSW and it’s the Corang River.  Hope to see you here one day!
    Kind regards 
    David. 

    Note the spider…How did that creature avoid death by fire?   The fires just got to the edge of David’s wilderness property.  



    OUR SEARCH FOR THE AUSTRALIAN HEADER HARVESTER, 

    David’s note brings back memories of the time Marjorie, Andrew and I visited Australia in search of the famous Australian Header Harvester, an invention
    whose principles can  be traced back to the vast CARTHAGINIAN grain fields of North Africa in Roman times.  We drove into the Blue Mountains of New South Wales
    driving blind which is always an exciting way to make discoveries.  FOOUND the header harvester in a tiny village bar …then An Australian farmer took us out in the
     blackness of night over his fields and Eucalyptus
    groves just to show us a tiny stream where a platypus lived under a small farm bridge.  His truck had ‘Roo bars’…I bet you do not know what that means.

    Partial  success  when we did find the Header Harvester reproduced on a beer can graphic as well as the real thing placed for all to see in Sydney.  The Australians
    were wonderful once they knew we were interested.    Massey Harris of
    Canada bought the patents and made a modern model of the harvester.  

    NOTE TO DAVID SKEOCH:  We never found a header harvester on an Australian farm.  Perhaps you have.  Is the image still on the beer cans?

    Australian FARMER, Tom Bailey, bought an old Number 6, Sunshine header harvester for $300.  I bought the image on a couple of beer cans for $3 or so.
    Some readers might wonder why we flew all the way to Australia just to find the machine.  It was the beer that drew me
    and perhaps our youngest son Andrew but not Marjorie.











    1935 Model of the Sunshine Header Harvester…the ancient Carthaginian model had the same kind of clipping blades  as
    I seem to remember.


    We visited Australia around 1990.   Sad to say I could not find the beer can in 2018 which does not mean it no longer exists.  Maybe David Skeoch can
    do a little research.  

    alan skeoch
    april 2021

    Post Script:  The end result of our global wandering was a 300 page MA thesis titled  ‘Technology and Change in Agriculture from 1850 to 1891’, University of
    Toronto,..It never made the best seller list.