Year: 2021

  • EPISODE 417 DROUGHT…2021…ADD DROUGHT TO THE LIST OF CATASTROPHES THIS YEAR

    EPISODE 417     DROUGHT…2021…ADD DROUGHT TO  THE LIST OF CATASTROPHES THIS YEAR


    alan skeoch
    august 2021



    DROUGHT…THE BIG POND HAS NEARLY DRIED UP.

    When mom inherited our farm in 1958 or 1959 there was a large pond in the centre….loaded with
    all kinds of life forms from snakes to frogs to leeches…to sticklebacks to water spiders to bitterns
    to all manner of ducks including a secretive cluster of wood ducks who still hang around unseen.

    In subsequent years we increased the wetlands … Ron Saunders dug a deep pond extension where
    Grandad got his best hay and then Ron used his back hoe to make a nice pond near where the barn
    once stood then, even later,  Jim Sanderson brought in his giant excavator to deepen one
    of our most hidden swamps now a glorious shaded pool.

    Glad we did that.  Those new ponds are the only real  deep wetlands this year.  The drought of 2021 has
    dried up the big pond.   Now it has become  a hideous hodge podge of dead tag alders and shrivelled 
    water lillies.

    Lucky the new ponds…..i.e. ponds created in the last 50 years…are deep.  The turtles have a place
    to live… the big snapper we rescued a year ago…and the painted turtle that seemed to believe
    cars and trucks would avoid him or her sitting in the centre of the fifth line and heading slowly for one of our
    deep ponds.  We hope our resident turtles greeted the new arrivals.

    A bit depressing to look at the big pond today.  But my depression was lifted when a wild momma
    turkey appeared with her near grown cluster of progeny.  They scattered and gobbled when they saw me.

  • EPISODE 416 WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE?

    EPISODE 416     WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE?


    alan skeoch
    august 2021

    This caught my eye at the Fish Derby.   Was the man deadly ilL, perhaps dead??  Why was he half submerged
    in a Mississauga City dumpster?



    HE IS COLLECTING BOTTLES AND CANS.  HOW MUCH WILL HE GET FROM
    THIS DUMPSTER…YOU DO THE COUNTING.

    ONE BOTTLE BROKE SO HE PICKED UP ALL THE SHARDS OF GLASS
    LEST SOMEONE GET HURT.

  • EPISODE 416 THE GINKGO TREE…LONE SURVIVOR FROM THE CARBONIFEROUS ERA

    EPISODE 416      THE GINKGO TREE…LONE SURVIVOR FROM THE CARBONIFEROUS ERA


    alan skeoch
    august 24, 2021



    THE ANCIENT GINKGO TREE

    We have a Ginkgo tree growing beside our house.   So what?  So we have a living fossil dating back
    deep  into the geologic history of our earth.   Ginkgo trees seem to have thrived in the Carboniferous era
    2999 to 350 million years ago. Those 51 million years were wet and warm most of the time so great 
    tropical jungles covered the land mass.   Huge swamps we’re full of life.  And then the world changed
    and that life mass became extinct except for the Gingko tree  By luck and good care by Chinese Buddhist 
    monks the Gingko was saved from extinction.   The ancient trees of this kind are
    Only to be found in the huge layers of coal that
    dot the earth today.  None survived in the wild. Were it not for the Buddhist monks
    none would have survived.  A remarkable story.

    Today the Ginkgo is the national tree of China.   Ginkgo’s are part of most North American cities.
    They are tough.   They are also very unusual.  They reproduce in a manner similar to humans.
    Sperm from male Ginkgo tree float on the air .. riding on pollen …in their search for female
    Ginkgo trees to fertilize.  Sex.

    This manner of reproduction is proof of their ancient origin.   Ginkgo trees were alive on earth
    before the age of flowers.    Flowering plants were so successful that they pushed earlier
    plant forms towards extinction….except for the Ginkgo.

    Our Gingko tree is a male ginkgo.   Most of the ginkgo trees found on city streets (like along
    Lakeshore Road in Mimico, West Toronto) are male ginkgo trees.  Few people want female ginkgo trees
    anywhere near their property.   Why?  Because they stink.  I mean really stink.  One source
    says they over their seeds with a fleshy material that smells like human vomitl  Others are
    less polite and say the ginkgo berries smell like dog shit.  Female trees are kept in special
    nuseries as a result.   Why so stinky?   Another survival skill.  Certain creatures life rotten
    or rotting food.  They set the berries and then excrete the nuts.  Spread the Ginkgo trees
    that way.

    Sometimes a male tree will fool everyone and switch to become a female.  Or develop
    a female branch on the male tree.  This is thought to be a survival skill.

    If you can stand the smell (vomit or dog shit) and clean the fleshy material off the nut
    then Ginkgo berries are edible.   Some people, mostly Chinese I think, value the nuts.
    Ginkgo trees are valued by medical experts for a variety of ailments.

    The trees can live s long time.  One Ginkgo in central China is reputed to be 1,000 years old.

    Our ginkgo is about 10 years old.  It has a long life ahead of it unless  it decides to change sex.


    Gingko fruits
    These Ginkgo berries smell so bad that they have to be cleaned up as soon as
    they fall…smell like vomit or dog dung, take your pick.  Why?   Smell designed to
    attract creatures who find smell attractive.  This evolved in time more ancient than
    flowering trees.

    OPEN PIT COAL MINE IN RUSSIA — FINDS FOSSILS OF GINKGO TREE

    The fossils… 300 million year old remains of a once tropical jungle were noticed
    on the top layer of this open pit coal deposit below..  The last jungle of the Carboniferous Era, at least
     that is what the fossils seem to suggest.  These discoveries are so recent that they
    have not been fully documented.

     THE GINKGO WAS THERE AMONG THE GIANT FERNS, 

    How could slower growing trees like the Ginkgo compete with rapid growing
    giant ferns (60 feet high and higher)?  Apparently the Ginkgo trees “bolted”
    …in other words the trunk grew fast and straight …. no branches until it
    got higher than the ferns.   Hence the ginkgo trees had their leafy
    tops higher than the ferns.  Illustrations can be seen in theoretical drawings
    of these ancient tropical jungles.

    Our gingko tree in the side yard has grown in that manner…i.e. bolted…but
    this effect may have been much more recent.   Modern ginkgo are less speedy


    Paleontologists find fossil relative of Ginkgo biloba

    Another similar discovery has been made recently in central Mongolia.  And Still another was noticed 
    on the ceiling of an exhausted coal mine in Russia.
    Open pit mine in Tevshiin Govi in central Mongolia where the mummified fossil plants were found. Credit: Fabiany Herrera & Patrick Herendeen

    “A discovery of well-preserved fossil plants by paleontologists from the United States, China, Japan, 

    Russia and Mongolia has allowed researchers to identify a distant relative of the living plant Ginkgo biloba.”

    MEDICINAL VALUE OF THE GINKGO

    I leave that for you to research.  Lots of info available.


    alan
    August 24, 2021



  • EPISODE 415 CARBONIFERUS Era -51 million years ago -where we get out coal.

    EPISODE 414   when will we deplete oil, gas and coal deposits on planet earth?(gifts from the carboniferous era)

    alan skeoch
    august 23, 2021

    Much of THE world was one gigantic swamp 350 million years ago

    Picture of anthracite coal from Pennsylvania.   Look at the layering…ancient trees

    It took 50 million years for beds of coal to be formed from the huge treeanimals living in the 
    dense jungles and immense swamps of the Carboniferosera 299 to 350 million years ago.  Correction that immense pile of dead matter

    was laid down 51 million years ago. A million years extra.Then the great piles of vegetation were covered
    with sedimentary rock and heated from the molten bowels of the earth.   We call
    the stuff coal today.   Really pressured ancient detritus became anthracite coal.
    Less pressured material became soft of bituminous coal.  Both forms of’
    coal were the basis of our Industrial Revolution which began about 1800 and
    is still underway.   We have been burning coal, lots of it, for the last 221 years.

    Now which time period is longer?  1) The Caroniferous Age  299 to 350 million years
                                                                                or
                                                           2) The Industrial Revolution  1800 to 2021 (and beyond to 2090)

    Can the two events even be compared.  Our place in the history of the earth is tiny.
    Silly question.  But a question that makes me wonder whether the world as we know can
    survive when the coal runs out   And it will run out.

    What about oil?  good question.  We will run out of oil in 2053….32 years form now according 
    to a British Petroleum study.

    What about gas?  good question…we will run out of gas n 2,060…39 years from now.

    Is there an alternative?   Of course there are alternative sources of energy.   That is why
    we re talking more and more about electricity.   Electric cars are already being manufactured
    en masse.   But electric energy needs something to turn those turbines.   Water power is an
    answer but there are only so many rivers that can be dammed (damn it)..  Nuclear power
    is another turbine turner but what will we do with the deadly waste…and we all
    remember Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.  Wind power…sunlight..other power sources currently
    provide A minuscule part of our energy needs




    A WORD  FROM OTHERS

    Oil will end by 2052   – 30 years time

    Gas will end by 2060  – 40 years time

    Coal will last till 2090 –   70 years time

    However, according to BP [5], earth has 53 years of oil reserves left at current rate of consumption.

    Figure 1  Energy reserves in billion tonnes of oil equivalent – Btoe [4]

    Gioietta_1_23

    According to the 2019 Annual Energy Outlook [6] global GDP growth between 2017 and 2040 is expected to average 3.4%. 

    The world energy demand will grow by 1/3 through 2040, driven mostly by rising consumption in transportation in China, India and parts of Asia.


    This is obviously unsustainable. These are horrific figures that will happen sooner than we can possibly mitigate.

    COAL

    So this takes us back to coal..  Dirty old coal will be around for the rest of this century and beyond. 
    COAL is a problematic energy source even though it started and still sustains industrialization.  Burning
    both anthracite and bituminous coal destroys the air we breathe.  Tiny particles of
    coal in the air we breathe works like sandpaper in our lungs.  Black Lung…by product is S02…sulphur
    dioxide which becomes H2SO4 when combined with water. Sulphuric Acid.  Acid Rain.

    Where is the coal?  Two countries have the largest coal supply in the world.
    First is the United Ststes and second is China.   Both countries resist the
    efforts of environmentalists to stop burning coal.  It is killing us…smoke
    and waste.   Acid rain. It seems we will burn coal until we have used up 
    all the coal that it took 51 million years to create…and we will do that within the
    lifetimes of our grandchildren. Then what?

    SOME UNINFORMED SPECULATION: SOME WORDS OF HOPE

    Enough of this doom and gloom.  Is there an answer that could provide cheap
    energy for this century and centuries to come.  I think the answer is yes…infinite 
    source of energy could be found in the water we drink and in the rivers, lakes and
    oceans that cover
    most of our planet.  Hydrogen!.  What is the by product of burning hydrogen?  Water.
    H20.  Split the water into its component parts.   We already do that.  Yes, it is dangerous.

    Who am I?  I am nor a chemist or even a scientist.  So once again I turn to my
    science mentor, Robert Root.   What do you think Bob?   What will we do when
    the coal, oil and gas are all used up?   and isn’r reliance on coal stupid in the short run?

    Gioietta_1_23




    Gioietta_1_23


  • EPISODE 414 PORT CREDIT SALMON DERBY, AUGUST 2021 (bet you never heard of Howard Tanner until today)

    EPISODE 414   PORT CREDIT  SALMON DERBY … (Who is Howard Tanner?)


    alan skeoch
    august 2021


    “Andy, where are the fishermen?”
    “Where are you?”

    “Sitting on a bench beside the Credit River…no  one knows 
    anything about the Salmon Fishing Derby.”
    “That’s because we are all out in the lake fishing.”
    “Dad, just sit tight …The harbour will soon be filled with 50 fishing boats
    and lots of Coho and Chinook Salmon for your story…High Noon…Fish Derby ends.”

    Sure enough.  At noon the harbour was bubbling with fish boats and happy
    fishermen.  IT WAS TIME TO SEE WHO GOT THE BIGGEST SALMON.


    This Chinook Pacific salmon is swimming in all the GreAT Lakes…voracious creature.  A CHINOOK SALMON.

    BUT FIRST READ THIS

       I bet dollars to donuts that few of you have ever heard of Howard Tanner.   He changed the Great Lakes and nobody around me today seems to be
    aware of what happened back in 1966 when Howard Tanner played fast and loose with our Great Lakes by ‘seeding’ Lake Michigan with baby salmon from the
    Pacific Ocean.   Coho and Chinook Salmon.  Voracious predators that gobble up alewives like there is no tomorrow.   

    “When our 50 boatloads of fishermen hit the dock…everyone nearby will know what lurks out there..”
    “Who could believe that these huge creatures are chomping on alewives just s few kilometres out in the lake?”
    “Only the fishermen.”
    “Why not the general public?”
    “Because these gigantic creatures spend most of their lives in water that is 100 to 200 feet deep.  Dark down there…perfect
    place for these monsters.”

    There he is now.  Andrew Skeoch and two fishing brothers.

    “We got a big one, Dad, maybe a winner…we’ll see at the weigh in.”
    (Andrew and his friends came sixth.)


    Andrew Skeoch describes the salmon caught today…a contender for the big money prize at the
    Port Credit fish Derby.  His morher, Marjorie, is suitably impressed.


    These fish coffins needed two men to carry.

    There is no fish quite as ugly as a mature Chinook salmon…except maybe
    a Snakehead.  Snakehead?   Yes, There are other creatures starting to creep into our waters.
    Another story.


    HOW DID PACIFIC SALMON…CHINOOK AND COHO…BECOME THE TOP PREDATOR FISH IN THE GREAT LAKES?

    HOWARD TANNER…DID IT IN 1966…55 years ago.

    STOCKING THE GREAT LAKES WITH PACIFIC SALMON WAS AN EXPERIMENT IN 1966.  TODAY, AUGUST 2021, THE EXPERIMENT IS AN OBVIOUS SUCCESS.

    ALAN SKEOCH

    P{ost Script: excerpt from article written in 2015 by mynorthmedia

    The Improbable Tale of How Howard Tanner Unleashed Salmon in the Great Lakes


    o be clear, what Howard Tanner was now contemplating was nothing less than the intentional introduction of a non-native Pacific species to the largest freshwater system in the world. And when he worked up the nerve to start speaking publicly about his idea, people were quick to raise concerns. First and foremost, no fisheries biologist had ever attempted to manage water even close to this size. In Tanner’s case, his master’s degree program had put him in charge of a 27-acre lake; his doctoral program, six lakes—the largest of which was six acres. Lake Michigan alone was 23 million acres. “It was like somebody who had gotten good at raising geraniums in flower pots was now being given a cattle ranch,” Tanner says.
    There were also logistical questions. Some argued salmon would die in freshwater or simply head into the St. Lawrence River and out to the open ocean. Others pointed to the many failed attempts to introduce salmon to the Great Lakes dating back to the late 1800s. The plan also faced one giant, undeniable obstacle: coho salmon, the fish that Tanner had identified as the species of choice, simply couldn’t be had. At the time, every single coho egg harvested from the hatcheries of Oregon and Washington were spoken for—part of a grand attempt to re-establish salmon in the heavily dammed Columbia River.

    Then came the phone call.
    Howard Tanner was sitting in his living room, having his usual pre-dinner cocktail. On the line was one of his old Western colleagues. He was calling to let Tanner know there was an anticipated surplus of coho eggs on the West Coast.
    “It was just like the chair fell from under me,” Tanner remembers. “That night, I didn’t sleep much. I just sat there most of the night, thinking, What if … What if?”
    The following morning, he was in his office watching the clock tick. With a three-hour difference between Michigan and the coast, he had to wait until midday to confirm the rumors that coho were available. The hearsay turned out to be true. Still, to get some of the eggs, he and his contacts in Oregon would have to navigate a gauntlet of bureaucracy. On top of that, they were working with an immovable biological deadline: If the surplus coho eggs were going to be viable for hatching and release back in Michigan, the whole plan would have to get every bureaucratic stamp in no more than six weeks. But, in a scenario Tanner can characterize only with words like “miracle,” the approvals came. Within a few weeks, one million coho salmon eggs were on a plane, bound for the Great Lakes. Tanner’s spectacular experiment was now underway.
    Everything happened so fast that Tanner didn’t yet have money for things like fish food. And he didn’t know exactly where he was going to raise the fish once they hatched. Michigan’s hatchery system, which had been largely devoted to restoring lake trout, was 40 years out of date and in no shape to undertake a program of this size. He went to the legislature and asked for a million dollars—half of which he finally won by promising the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee that 150,000 of the salmon (and the promised economic boom) would land in the senator’s district. Tanner and his team then embarked on a tour of the state’s hatchery system, looking for just the right place to raise the fish. Eventually, the hatchery on the modest Platte River in Benzie County was chosen as the spot where the salmon would start their lives—and, theoretically, return to spawn—if everything went according to plan.
    Tanner remembers the moment when the fish were finally ready to be Michigan Department of Natural Resourcesreleased as one of the great moments of his career. It was April 2, 1966, and the now year-and-a-half-old coho were ready to enter the Platte River near Honor, Michigan. He had a special wooden speaker’s platform built for the event. Public officials offered words touting the benefits of the salmon program. The press took photos. Then, Arnell Engstrom, the Traverse City house representative whose vote had been critical in funding the salmon program, picked up a golden bucket and dumped the first batch into the Lake Michigan watershed. Tanner got his turn later in the afternoon on Bear Creek, a tributary of the Manistee, at a site just below Tippy Dam. Swimming with the current, the four-inch “smolts” would find their way to the open water in less than two days.
    If everything went according to plan, the young coho would spend a year and a half in the open water before returning to the Platte River in the fall of 1967. And early indications suggested the fish would indeed find their way home. In the fall of 1966, the “Jack” salmon—a small class of precocious fish that spawn a year ahead of schedule—started showing up in Platte Bay, many in a form that astonished Tanner’s Western colleagues and foreshadowed a potentially colossal spawning run the following year. “On the coast, the Jack will maybe weigh a pound and a half or two pounds,” Tanner says. “Some of our fish were coming back at seven pounds. The guys from Oregon just shook their heads and said, ‘You’d better get ready. You’d better get ready.’ ”
    Even today, what happened next still stands as the biggest “big fish” story in Great Lakes history. In late August 1967, tens of thousands of returning salmon suddenly announced their presence—this time without a formal speech. coho rushed into Platte Bay, and the fishermen followed—largely learning of the spectacle by word of mouth. Tanner has aerial photos from that fall showing tiny Platte Bay jammed with 3,000-plus boats, many of them canoes and little aluminum dinghies not suitable for open water. The boats formed a near-solid mass; some fishermen joked you could almost walk from boat to boat and never get wet. And in between, the fish were so thick, they were porpoising out of the water.
    Tiny coastal towns like Honor, Empire and Frankfort suddenly found themselves overrun with tens of thousands of fishermen and wannabe fishermen. The tiny boat launches grew tails of cars and trailers that ran miles long. One man, Tanner remembers, even started a taxi service to ferry people back and forth. Another guy was selling hot dogs. Lures sold out, so people started renting lures. In September, Sports Illustrated even showed up to cover the event they dubbed a “boom on Lake Michigan.”
    People who had never caught any fish of any size like these were catching five, and their tiny little boats were just full of salmon. Nobody had to embellish the stories. It was madness.
    Michigan Department of Natural Resources
    The impacts of the salmon were huge and immediate. The value of riparian property in the surrounding area doubled almost instantly. Hotels and businesses sprouted up in Michigan’s new salmon country. Tiny Honor, Michigan, population 300, even christened itself the state’s new “Coho Capital.” The joyful hysteria was only briefly interrupted by tragedy on September 23, when the crush of mostly inexperienced anglers ignored small-craft warnings and found themselves overrun by a violent Lake Michigan storm. One hundred fifty boats were swamped; seven people drowned. But it hardly blunted the public’s appetite for salmon. Now, every coastal town’s bait shop and city hall were lobbying for the fish to be planted in the local stream. And the state delivered, stocking millions more coho across the rest of the Great Lakes in the following years, and furiously expanding the antiquated hatchery system to give the people what they wanted.
    Doubling down on its great salmon experiment, the state added an even bigger trophy to the mix of Great Lakes fish the following year. The Chinook salmon was a Pacific species two to three times bigger than the coho, was cheaper to produce, and had a diet that consisted almost exclusively of the hated alewife. Within a few years of the new super-salmon hitting the open water, reeling in a 30-pounder became common. Fishermen loved it. Sunbathers loved the fact that alewives weren’t rotting on their beaches. And the fisheries department kept the big fish coming, flooding the Great Lakes with millions of coho and Chinook every year—the state’s economy, in turn, flooding with the windfalls of a world-class fishery that seemed to have been created overnight.
    “It almost gave us the impression that the system was unlimited,” says Randy Claramunt, a fisheries research biologist with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. “The more salmon we put in, the more salmon we got out. Literally, we went from zero stocking to almost eight million a year in the 1980s, and we still had record-high harvest levels.”
    By the mid-1980s, there was no arguing that Tanner’s original vision had indeed evolved into something worthy of the word “spectacular.” Just two decades after his coho fingerlings were released into the Platte River, the salmon had brought under control one of the area’s worst invaders, alewives. The sport-fishing industry, previously non-existent, was now valued in the billions of dollars. And people came from all over the country to fish the Great Lakes.
    But the record catches and the new trickle-down salmon economy in which everyone seemed a winner weren’t telling the whole story. Though no one knew it at the time, the Lake Michigan fishery, the crown jewel of the lakes, was beginning to strain. The system did indeed have limits. And without warning, the once-mighty Chinook, the adopted king of Michigan waters, all but vanished almost as quickly as it appeared.
    In a plot twist worthy of the theater, it was the demise of the fish everybody hated that brought down the fish everybody loved. The alewife—the invasive saltwater species that was best known for dying and rotting en masse on Michigan beaches—had given the Chinook salmon what seemed like an endless food supply. In fact, when the salmon program was first conceived, it was never done so as an alewife control program; the small invaders were so prolific that the idea that their populations could be significantly impacted by a predator seemed like wishful thinking.
    In less than two decades, however, the Chinook began to chip away at the alewife’s dominance. In fact, by the early 1980s, alewife biomass in the Great Lakes stood at less than 20 percent of historic highs—largely because of salmon predation. With less to eat, the salmon being reeled in from the lakes started to get smaller and thinner. Then, in the mid-1980s, the already-stressed Chinook was overcome by an outbreak of a mysterious kidney disease, one that would later be linked to the high-density hatcheries unknowingly pushing out diseased fish to keep up with the public’s demand for salmon. Though the less-fished and more-adaptable coho toughed it out, the mighty Chinook soon disappeared from Lake Michigan.
    More than a decade later, the story repeated itself in Lake Huron in an even more devastating fashion. Better rates of natural reproduction and heavy stocking led to a scenario in which the Chinook ate themselves out of an ecosystem. To make matters worse, new invasive species like the zebra and quagga mussels—both of which filtered plankton out of the lake—undermined the alewives’ own food supply. Faced with pressure from both the bottom and top of the food chain, the alewife population collapsed in the early 2000s, the Chinook population following close behind. Stories of big fish harvested from Lake Huron were quickly replaced by those of gas stations, hotels and restaurants going belly-up. There were even stories about charter boat fishermen moving west to try to start over on the Lake Michigan side, where salmon populations had started to rebound.
    The salmon bust revealed new truths that had gradually become latent fundamentals of the salmon program. For one, if the state was going to maintain salmon as a top predator in the Great Lakes, it needed a more nuanced policy than raising as many fish as it could and dumping them into the water. It was also obvious now that the salmon economy had grown too big to fail: The experiment that Howard Tanner had started almost on a hunch had now evolved into a $7 billion economy and a vital tool for restoring balance to the largest freshwater system in the world. More importantly, though, the salmon program had inadvertently ushered in an era whereby the Great Lakes would now be a highly managed entity, and from which there was no turning back.